Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Hamid Reza Nadaf vs Sina Moghimi Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nadaf vs Moghimi analysis and find out who is favored!
Hamid Reza Nadaf vs Sina Moghimi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nadaf 1 - 0 Moghimi
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nadaf has won 44.74% of points on his second serve, while Moghimi has won 44.14%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nadaf, in recent form, has won 53.38% of his opponent's second serve points, while Moghimi has won 54.01%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.38% and 36.6% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nadaf has saved 44.74% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Moghimi has saved 52.73% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nadaf has won 36.36% of matches played (W/L 8/ 14), with Moghimi winning 47.37% (W/L 9/ 10) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nadaf has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 24/ 21), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 35/ 58). Moghimi has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 22/ 18), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 22/ 18).
- Player level: In the last year, Nadaf has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 36.36% of matches (W/L 8/ 14), where as Moghimi has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 47.37% of matches (W/L 9/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nadaf winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Nadaf winning 2 and Moghimi winning 1. The last match between Nadaf and Moghimi was at the M15 Kish Island, 28-02-2024, First, Clay with Hamid Reza Nadaf getting the victory 6-2 6-7(6) 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:58:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nadaf and Moghimi have played a deciding set 1 times, with Nadaf winning 1 times and Moghimi 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Nadaf winning 0, and Moghimi 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nadaf has played against opponents with an average rank of 89.59 while Moghimi has played against players with an average rank of 107.21.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nadaf has won 29% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Moghimi has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nadaf has converted 48.94% of breakpoint opportunities, and Moghimi has converted 42.86% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
873
Rank
803
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
43% (59-79)
Career Total W/L
55% (22-18)
50% (3-3)
YTD W/L
43% (6-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Hamid Reza Nadaf | Sina Moghimi |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 18 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 11 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:58:0 | 2:58:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (55/88) | 64% (68/106) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 58% (32/55) | 49% (33/68) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 45% (15/33) | 34% (13/38) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (10/20) | 67% (6/9) |
| Return Points W% | 57% (60/106) | 47% (41/88) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-7(6) 6-2 |
Stats 
Hamid Reza Nadaf
Player
Sina Moghimi
63%
(
55 of
88)
1st Serve %
64%
(
68 of
106)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
11
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
50%
(
10 of
20)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
47%
(
41 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
60 of
106)
107
Total Points Won
87
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Hamid Reza Nadaf | Sina Moghimi |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (3/3) | 43% (6/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (7/7) | 45% (15/18) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (59/60) | 48% (148/159) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 43% (6/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.04 | 0.05 |
| Aces Total | 2 | 7 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.27 |
| DFs Total | 15 | 41 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:28:34 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 95.33 | 96.14 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (250/364) | 73% (606/828) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (153/250) | 56% (339/606) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (51/114) | 44% (98/222) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (23/47) | 43% (42/98) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (181/407) | 43% (342/804) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (3/3) | 43% (6/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (3/6) | 43% (6/14) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 20% (10/2) |
Hamid Reza Nadaf Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gergely Madarasz
Player
Hamid Reza Nadaf
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve %
63%
(
15 of
24)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
9 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
38
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matyas Fuele
Player
Hamid Reza Nadaf
50%
(
32 of
64)
1st Serve %
72%
(
31 of
43)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hamid Reza Nadaf
Player
Sina Moghimi
63%
(
55 of
88)
1st Serve %
64%
(
68 of
106)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
11
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
50%
(
10 of
20)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
47%
(
41 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
60 of
106)
107
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 6-7(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matyas Fuele
Player
Hamid Reza Nadaf
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
91)
8
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
32%
(
28 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hamid Reza Nadaf
Player
Daniel Khazime
77%
(
54 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hamid Reza Nadaf
Player
Amirali Ghavam
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
77%
(
37 of
48)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-2 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-1 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-3 10-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Sina Moghimi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Edison Ambarzumjan
Player
Sina Moghimi
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
80%
(
51 of
64)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
Sina Moghimi
84%
(
46 of
55)
1st Serve %
72%
(
48 of
67)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
11 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sina Moghimi
Player
Courtney John Lock
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
0
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gokberk Saritas
Player
Sina Moghimi
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve %
74%
(
56 of
76)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Sina Moghimi
Player
Caspar Schuetze
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
6
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Martins Rocens
Player
Sina Moghimi
55%
(
51 of
93)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
88)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
38%
(
16 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
51%
(
47 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
47 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 5-7 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-0 10-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Adil Kalyanpur
Player
Sina Moghimi
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve %
82%
(
37 of
45)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hamid Reza Nadaf
Player
Sina Moghimi
63%
(
55 of
88)
1st Serve %
64%
(
68 of
106)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
11
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
50%
(
10 of
20)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
47%
(
41 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
60 of
106)
107
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 6-7(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Nadaf Vs Moghimi Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
